Choosing Between Competing Programs

Doug Ringer

6 days ago

1 min read

Choosing the program with the highest forecast return is not portfolio management.

It is spreadsheet management.

When two programs compete for the same money, Portfolio Investment Arbitration uses four screens:

Driving-force fit
Strength versus weakness
Product-line gap
Replacement of a profitable product nearing end of useful life

If two programmes still appear tied after those screens, the problem may not be the ranking method.

The budget may simply be too small for the strategy.

Portfolio decisions are allocation decisions. The real question is not only which programme looks attractive in isolation, but which use of capital and capacity best advances the product business.

Recent Posts

See All

PRODUCT LEADERSHIP PRINCIPLE: Many Execution Problems Begin Before Execution

When a product misses its schedule, struggles in the market, or fails to deliver the expected return, the natural reaction is to look at execution. Engineering was late. The launch was weak. Sales was

PRODUCT-BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE: When Supply Chain Becomes Product Strategy

Reuters recently reported that GE Aerospace plans to acquire Consolidated Precision Products for $11.75 billion, bringing an important source of highly engineered engine castings much closer to the bu

What Mainstream Product Management Often Leaves Out

This is a good summary of mainstream product management — and it also shows what is often missing. “Business goals” is doing a lot of work in one small corner. Product management is a business role. T

Choosing Between Competing Programs

Recent Posts

Comments

Product leadership is business leadership.